<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2 Minute Tricks # 15 - Infrared</title>
	<link>http://tricks.onigo.net/2005/11/11/2-minute-tricks-15-infrared/</link>
	<description>The podcast with quick, useful Photoshop tips and tricks for the beginner and advanced digital photographer alike.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dorothy</title>
		<link>http://tricks.onigo.net/2005/11/11/2-minute-tricks-15-infrared/#comment-17935</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 19:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tricks.onigo.net/2005/11/11/2-minute-tricks-15-infrared/#comment-17935</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;What a great site&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Howard Chalkley</title>
		<link>http://tricks.onigo.net/2005/11/11/2-minute-tricks-15-infrared/#comment-63</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 21:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tricks.onigo.net/2005/11/11/2-minute-tricks-15-infrared/#comment-63</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;In Elements: you can get the 'channel mixer' from Earthbound Light, but there doesn't seem to be a way to blur just the green channel of a layer.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Elements: you can get the &#8216;channel mixer&#8217; from Earthbound Light, but there doesn&#8217;t seem to be a way to blur just the green channel of a layer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TimTheEnchanter</title>
		<link>http://tricks.onigo.net/2005/11/11/2-minute-tricks-15-infrared/#comment-25</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 23:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tricks.onigo.net/2005/11/11/2-minute-tricks-15-infrared/#comment-25</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Jen,
The final resolution all depends on what output type you plan on doing.  Most inkjet-style poster printers need only 72ppi @ 100%.  I always recommend a &quot;LiteJet&quot; type of output for 3 reasons. 1-You can get away with 100ppi @100% with great results, 2-type if set in Quark/InDesign/Illustrator or vector in Photoshop comes out sharp, 3-It is a digital output to photographic paper (reflective and backlit) so photos retain high-quality and sharpness even close-up.  So your image that is 15 x 20 @300ppi would be 45 x 60 @100ppi.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As far as under-resolution images, Photoshop will do okay interpolating up to 150% (for my standards), but anything above I use a plug-in called Genuine Fractals- http://www.ononesoftware.com/   The results are amazing with it, I highly recommend it.  Depending on how much you need to come up, you might want to wait until you flatten the image to &quot;size it up&quot; if it gets to be too much for your computer to handle.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Good luck!
TTE :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jen,
The final resolution all depends on what output type you plan on doing.  Most inkjet-style poster printers need only 72ppi @ 100%.  I always recommend a &#8220;LiteJet&#8221; type of output for 3 reasons. 1-You can get away with 100ppi @100% with great results, 2-type if set in Quark/InDesign/Illustrator or vector in Photoshop comes out sharp, 3-It is a digital output to photographic paper (reflective and backlit) so photos retain high-quality and sharpness even close-up.  So your image that is 15 x 20 @300ppi would be 45 x 60 @100ppi.</p>

<p>As far as under-resolution images, Photoshop will do okay interpolating up to 150% (for my standards), but anything above I use a plug-in called Genuine Fractals- http://www.ononesoftware.com/   The results are amazing with it, I highly recommend it.  Depending on how much you need to come up, you might want to wait until you flatten the image to &#8220;size it up&#8221; if it gets to be too much for your computer to handle.</p>

<p>Good luck!
TTE :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jennifer Tofani</title>
		<link>http://tricks.onigo.net/2005/11/11/2-minute-tricks-15-infrared/#comment-17</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 18:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tricks.onigo.net/2005/11/11/2-minute-tricks-15-infrared/#comment-17</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your Podcast is great, very helpful.
Thankyou!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have a quetion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am supposed to make composite images for panels 4 feet x 8 feet.
But the original images I have been given for this are 15 inches x 20 inches 300 dpi, many are in LAB.
I only need to use about 3 or 4 images per panel which means that the original I have been given need to up-sized if I maintain 300 dpi.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Question would 150 dpi be good enough?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What is the best way to up-size/
In the document?
before dragging it into the new document?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And I know this will be a slow process, I am fiddling with a 4 gig file now!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for any help or advice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jen&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>

<p>Your Podcast is great, very helpful.
Thankyou!</p>

<p>I have a quetion.</p>

<p>I am supposed to make composite images for panels 4 feet x 8 feet.
But the original images I have been given for this are 15 inches x 20 inches 300 dpi, many are in LAB.
I only need to use about 3 or 4 images per panel which means that the original I have been given need to up-sized if I maintain 300 dpi.</p>

<p>Question would 150 dpi be good enough?</p>

<p>What is the best way to up-size/
In the document?
before dragging it into the new document?</p>

<p>And I know this will be a slow process, I am fiddling with a 4 gig file now!</p>

<p>Thanks for any help or advice.</p>

<p>Jen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
